Delacruz

Delacruz v. Tanimura & Antle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20235:23-cv-03034California5,172 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DANIEL DELACRUZ, Case No. 23-cv-03034-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING TANIMURA &

ANTLE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

v. DISMISS COMPLAINT AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

TANIMURA & ANTLE, INC., et al., STRIKE Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 7,

13 Plaintiff Daniel Delacruz, who is representing himself, filed this action against defendants Tanimura & Antle, Inc. (“TAI”), Mike Antle, Carmen Ponce, and Claudia Quirarte, asserting, among other things, that defendants unlawfully discriminated and retaliated against him based on a disability. Dkt. No. 1. Defendants TAI, Mr. Antle, and Ms. Ponce (collectively, “TAI defendants”), move pursuant to Rules 8 and 12(b)(6)1 to dismiss Mr. Delacruz’s complaint. Dkt. No. 7. Mr. Delacruz opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 19. He also filed a motion to strike the TAI defendants’ untimely reply papers, which the TAI defendants oppose. Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.