UnifySCC
UnifySCC v. Cody
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 UNIFYSCC, et al., Case No. 22-cv-01019-BLF
Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: ADMINSTRATIVE
v. MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY'S MATERIAL SARA H. CODY, et al., SHOULD BE SEALED Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 80]
12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed in connection with their Motion to Certify Class. ECF No. 80. Defendant County of Santa Clara (“County”) filed a statement in support of sealing certain exhibits. ECF No. 84. The Court has considered the motion, and its ruling is laid out below. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 …