Moyer

Moyer v. Cellura

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20235:23-cv-03004California3,131 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALLEN MOYER, et al., Case No. 23-cv-03004-SVK

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO STAY CASE

JOSEPH R. CELLURA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 23 Defendants.

On June 20, 2023, Plaintiffs Allen Moyer (“Moyer”) and ADMI Incorporated (“Plaintiff-ADMI”) filed the complaint in this action (the “California Action”), which alleges that Defendants Joseph R. Cellura (“Cellura”), ADMI Inc. (“Defendant-ADMI”), and Tarsin Mobile Inc. (“Tarsin”) have unfairly competed with Plaintiffs by falsely representing that Defendants purchased and/or were connected with Plaintiffs’ business operations and by “impersonating” and “imitat[ing]” Plaintiff-ADMI in a variety of ways. Dkt. 1. Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay this California Action under the first-to-file rule in light of a lawsuit between the Parties pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, ADMI Inc. et al. v. Moyer et…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.