Moore

Moore v. Flores

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20235:23-cv-02065California1,859 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RYAN T. MOORE, AL1638, Case No. 23-cv-02065-SK (PR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE

v.

FLORES, Correctional Officer, (ECF No. 8) Defendant(s).

Plaintiff, a prisoner at San Quentin State Prison (SQSP), has filed a pro se civil rights First Amended Complaint (FAC) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that, during a “video legal visit” with his attorney on July 21, 2022, Correctional Officer Flores “eavesdropp[ed” on the “time sensitive confidential conversation.” FAC (ECF No. 8) at 5. Plaintiff further alleges that the eavesdropping “continue[s]” and he no longer has confidence in having “further video visits.” Id. Plaintiff seeks damages and injunctive relief. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.