Shiheiber

Shiheiber v. Hernandez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20233:21-cv-00609California864 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IBRAHIM NIMER SHIHEIBER,

Case No. 21-cv-00609-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR MOTION FOR

BRETT HERNANDEZ, RECONSIDERATION

10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 116

12 Defendant has filed a Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration (“Motion”) asking the Court for leave to bring a motion to reconsider its ruling at the October 20, 2023 pretrial conference that Plaintiff adequately asserted a federal false arrest claim in the operative complaint and therefore may proceed with that claim at trial. Defendant relies on Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(3), providing that a motion for reconsideration may be permitted where there is “[a] manifest failure by the Court to consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments which were presented to the Court before such interlocutory order.” Defendant’s argument fails for two reasons. First, the argument Defendant now makes –…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.