Cellwitch Inc. v. Tile, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CELLWITCH INC., Case No. 19-cv-01315-JSW
Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PARTIES' v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO
SEAL
TILE, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 162, 185, 192, 197, 199 Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court are the Parties’ various requests to seal portions of their briefing on Plaintiff Cellwitch, Inc.’s (“Cellwitch”) Motion to Enforce IPR Estoppel (Dkt. No. 162), portions of their briefing on Defendant Tile, Inc.’s (“Tile”) Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Answer to the Amended Complaint (Dkt. Nos. 185, 197), portions of a July 13, 2023 Meet and Confer transcript (Dkt. No. 192), and portions of Tile’s Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 199). For most judicial records, the party seeking to seal the record must demonstrate “compelling reasons” that would overcome the public’s right to view public records and documents, including judicial records. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 565 F.3d 1106, 1115-16 (9th…