Alcazar

Alcazar v. Fashion Nova, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20234:20-cv-01434California873 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUAN ALCAZAR, Case No. 20-cv-01434-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

FASHION NOVA, INC., Re: ECF No. 132 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Fashion Nova, Inc.’s motion for reconsideration. ECF No. 132. Defendant asks the Court to reconsider its July 6, 2023 order denying Defendant’s motion to amend the scheduling order. ECF No. 100. Specifically, Defendant requests leave to file a rebuttal expert report and to depose Plaintiff Juan Alcazar. ECF No. 132 at 2. The Court will deny the motion. The Court has discretion to reconsider its interlocutory orders at any point before it enters a final judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Amarel v. Connell, 102 F.3d 1494, 1515 (9th Cir. 1996). Reconsideration is generally appropriate only if “the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change in the controlling …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.