Martinez

Martinez v. County of Alameda

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20233:20-cv-06570California3,380 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 LISAMARIA MARTINEZ, Case No. 20-cv-06570-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. BIFURCATE

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 94 Defendants.

13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Lisamaria Martinez, who is blind, brings this disability rights action against Defendants County of Alameda, Melissa Wilk, Eva He, and Maria Laura Briones for their alleged exclusion from participation in or denial of benefits concerning services at the County Clerk- Recorder’s Office in 2019. Pending before the Court is Martinez’s Motion to Bifurcate, in which she requests the Court separate the trial into two phases under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(b). ECF No. 94. Defendants filed an opposition (ECF No. 95)1 and Martinez filed a reply (ECF No. 96). Having considered the arguments made and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Martinez’s motion for the following reasons.2

24 1 In a footnote in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.