Dominguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELIJAH DOMINGUEZ, Case No. 23-cv-00981-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE,

v. MOTIONS FOR MANDAMUS, QUO

WARRANTO, AND RELIEF A FROM

DAN PRATT, et al., JUDGMENT OR ORDER, AND

MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 26, 28, 29, 30, 31

Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate, Motions for Mandamus, Quo Warranto, and Relief from a Judgment or Order, and Motion to Appoint Counsel. Dkt. Nos. 29, 28, 30, 26, and 31. For the reasons detailed below, the Court denies them all. I. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE By his motion, Plaintiff requests to consolidate two cases before Judge Beeler – Elijah Dominguez v. Dan Pratts (23-cv-00981) and Elijah Dominguez v. John Allan Abaci (23-cv-03669) – in order to “avoid confusion and conflicting evidence[.]” Dkt. No. 29. Plaintiff does not explain why consolidation is warranted under Federal Rule of Civil…