Boyd

Boyd v. City of San Rafael

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20233:23-cv-04085California1,198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHALEETA BOYD, et al., Case No. 23-cv-04085-EMC (EMC)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER CLARIFYING SCOPE OF

v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, et al., Docket Nos. 98, 100 Defendants.

12 This Order clarifies aspects of this Court’s preliminary injunction issued on October 19, 2023 (Docket No. 98). The temporary restraining order issued on August 16, 2023 (Docket No. 19) and extended and modified on September 7, 2023 (Docket No. 67) is no longer in effect. The October 19 preliminary injunction order (Docket No. 98) converted that temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction. The terms of the TRO as applied to the residents at the Mahon Creek Path who have standing to seek injunctive relief remain in effect as part of the preliminary injunction, but as indicated in the October 19 Order, the preliminary injunction will be narrowed and modified once the preconditions identified in the Order are met. To make…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.