Milstead

Milstead v. General Motors LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20234:21-cv-06338California3,845 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES MILSTEAD, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06338-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

GENERAL MOTORS LLC, et al., Re: ECF No. 201 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendants General Motors LLC, General Motors Holdings LLC, and General Motors Company’s (collectively, “GM”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff James Milstead’s Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). ECF No. 201. The Court will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background1 Plaintiffs James Milstead, Arthur Ray, and Richard Vargas (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this action on behalf of themselves and a class of “persons and entities that purchased or leased” GM trucks or SUVs in California that were model years 1999 through 2018 (the “Class Vehicles”). ECF No. 197 ¶ 168. Because the facts are well-known to the parties and because the Court has detailed Plaintiffs’ allegations in a prior motion to dismiss order, ECF No. 177, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.