Maggay

Maggay v. Micke

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20235:21-cv-04994California10,780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RODERICK MAGGAY, Case No. 21-cv-04994 BLF (PR) Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OFFICER MICKE, et al.,

Defendants. (Docket No. 45)

19 Plaintiff, a Federal prisoner who is confined at the Federal Correctional Institution 20 at Herlong, filed the instant pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against 21 officers at the Santa Rita Jail for unconstitutional acts against him while housed there as a 22 pretrial detainee. The Court found the amended complaint, Dkt. No. 13, along with a 23 supplemental pleading, Dkt. No. 12, stated cognizable claims and ordered the matter served on Defendants. Dkt. No. 14. Defendants D. Micke and E. Perez filed a motion for

1 Plaintiff originally named one of the Defendants as “Officer Perry,” but this Defendant has since been correctly identified as Officer Perez who retired from the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office in 2020. Dkt. No. 41. summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.