Mattingly
Mattingly v. California Department of Parks and Recreation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MICHAEL JOSEPH MATTINGLY, Case No. 23-cv-03754-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING CALIFORNIA
v. DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND
RECREATION’S MOTION TO
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF DISMISS FEDERAL CLAIMS PARKS AND RECREATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants.
13 Plaintiff Michael Joseph Mattingly sues the California Department of Parks and Recreation (“CDPR”) and several of its officers, asserting federal and state law claims for violations of his civil rights. The officer defendants answered the complaint. Dkt. No. 10. CDPR moves pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss Mr. Mattingly’s federal claims. Dkt. No. 18. Mr. Mattingly opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 22. The matter is deemed suitable for determination without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The November 7, 2023 hearing is vacated. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, the Court…