Ferreira

Ferreira v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20234:23-cv-00518California3,720 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTINA FERREIRA, Case No. 23-cv-00518-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 35 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) and Rasier, LLC’s (“Rasier”) motion to compel arbitration. ECF No. 35. The Court will grant the motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Uber is a technology company that “develops proprietary software used to create digital marketplaces that are operated through app-based platforms” that “connect individual consumers in need of services with those willing to provide those services.” ECF No. 35-1 at 2. Plaintiff Christina Ferreira “has worked as a driver for Uber from approximately April 2022 to the present.” ECF No. 1 ¶ 14. Drivers who work for Uber “must license and download Uber’s ‘Driver App.’” ECF No. 35-1 at 2. To license the application, the drivers must agree to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.