Boston Retirement System v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20233:19-cv-06361California1,365 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BOSTON RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Case No. 19-cv-06361-RS (DMR) Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER ON SEPTEMBER 6, 2023

Plaintiff, JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER v. Re: Dkt. No. 322

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

The court has reviewed Lead Plaintiff and Individual Defendants’ September 6, 2023 Joint Discovery Letter (“JDL”) in which Lead Plaintiff seeks to compel amended responses to four interrogatories related to the due diligence defense under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933. This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, Lead Plaintiff’s motion is granted. Lead Plaintiff’s interrogatories 1 through 4 ask Individual Defendants: “If You contend that, prior to May 9, 2019, You conducted due diligence into the statements made in Uber’s Offering Documents concerning [1) Uber’s Passenger Safety Issues; 2) Uber’s Business…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.