Cordova

Cordova v. Lake County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20234:18-cv-00367California1,261 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICARDO DENNIS CORDOVA, Case No. 18-cv-00367-JSW (TSH)

Plaintiff,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 153, 157 LAKE COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff moves to compel concerning his second set of requests for production (“RFPs”) and his second set of interrogatories (“rogs”). ECF No. 153. The Court requested supplemental briefing concerning the validity of service, which the parties have provided. ECF Nos. 156, 157. The Court held a hearing this morning and now issues this order addressing the relevant issues. A. Validity of Service Plaintiff served the discovery requests at issue by email. ECF No. 153-1. Was this valid service? Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2) says:

A paper is served under this rule by:

(A) handing it to the person;

(B) leaving it:

(i) at the person’s office with a clerk or other person in charge or, if no one is in charge, in a conspicuous…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.