Gregg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTHONY GREGG, et al., Case No. 23-cv-02760-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE FURTHER BRIEFING

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 34, 35 BOHEMIAN CLUB, et al., Defendants.

12 Before the Court are motions to dismiss filed by both Pomella LLC (ECF 34) and Bohemian Club (ECF 35). Plaintiffs failed to timely respond to the motions, a topic addressed through the Court’s recent Order to Show Cause. See ECF 53. While the Court appreciates the candor of Plaintiffs’ counsel in his acknowledgement of an erroneous and mistaken belief regarding due dates (ECF 54 and ECF 54-1),1 the Court is disinclined to permit Plaintiffs to file a late opposition brief. The Court generally finds Defendants’ motions to dismiss meritorious. The remaining question is whether leave to amend should be granted. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) provides that the district court should “freely give leave when justice so requires” and “this policy is to be applied with extreme liberality.” Herring Networks, Inc.…