Keeton

Keeton v. Salinas Valley State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20233:22-cv-03964California2,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 TOMMY KEETON, Case No. 22-cv-03964-WHO (PR)

Plaintiff, SECOND ORDER OF SERVICE;

v. ORDER DIRECTING

DEFENDANTS TO FILE A

J. MORA, et al., DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR

NOTICE REGARDING SUCH

Defendants. MOTION;

INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Tommy Keeton alleges that correctional officers violated his federal rights. His first amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint containing these allegations is now before me for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Keeton has stated cognizable claims against Salinas Valley State Prison correctional officers T. Deslaurier Rixman, Juan Mora, Jose Gil-Rojas, and supervisor Elizabeth Gonzalez. The Court directs defendants Rixman, Mora, Gil-Rojas, and Gonzalez to file in response to the complaint a dispositive motion, or a notice regarding such motion, on or …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.