McCalla
McCalla v. Nord
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20234:22-cv-00675California3,269 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD A MCCALLA, Case No. 4:22-cv-00675-KAW
Plaintiff, PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
TENTATIVE RULINGS
v.
JAMES NORD, Defendant.
12 I. MOTIONS IN LIMINE MIL Motion Ruling Reason/Explanation Defendant opposes. Mr. Tate is a To exclude GRANTED IN qualified expert in regards to trust P1 Defendant’s liability PART administration. He is not qualified to expert from testifying testify regarding construction issues.
18 19 Plaintiff opposes. Appraisals are admissible under the business records To exclude property exception in Federal Rule of Evidence D1 appraisal evidence
DENIED
803(6). The appraisers do not have to be designated as experts, as they are percipient witnesses. 23 To preclude Plaintiff from argument and Plaintiff opposes.…