McCalla

McCalla v. Nord

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20234:22-cv-00675California3,269 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD A MCCALLA, Case No. 4:22-cv-00675-KAW

Plaintiff, PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

TENTATIVE RULINGS

v.

JAMES NORD, Defendant.

12 I. MOTIONS IN LIMINE MIL Motion Ruling Reason/Explanation Defendant opposes. Mr. Tate is a To exclude GRANTED IN qualified expert in regards to trust P1 Defendant’s liability PART administration. He is not qualified to expert from testifying testify regarding construction issues.

18 19 Plaintiff opposes. Appraisals are admissible under the business records To exclude property exception in Federal Rule of Evidence D1 appraisal evidence

DENIED

803(6). The appraisers do not have to be designated as experts, as they are percipient witnesses. 23 To preclude Plaintiff from argument and Plaintiff opposes.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.