Picetti

Picetti v. Stryker Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20234:23-cv-02645California2,451 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT PICETTI, Case No. 23-cv-02645-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

STRYKER CORPORATION, et al., Re: ECF No. 23 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Robert Picetti’s motion to remand. ECF No. 23. The Court will grant the motion. I. BACKGROUND Picetti filed this filed this wage and hour putative class action in state court on November 26, 2019, alleging that Defendants Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation “engaged in a pattern and practice of wage abuse against their commission-based employees.” ECF No. 23-2 at 215. Picetti brings this action on behalf of “[a]ll current and former California- based . . . employees . . . of Defendants paid wholly or in-part on a commission basis within the State of California at any time during the period from four years preceding the filing of this Complaint to final judgment.” Id. at 212. Picetti asserts eight causes of action against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.