Doe
Doe v. State Farm General Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES DOE, Case No. 3:23-cv-04734-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 10 STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY,
11 Defendant.
12 INTRODUCTION After losing a luxury watch, James Doe filed an insurance claim with State Farm for the value of that watch. State Farm denied that claim. Now, Doe is bringing a purported class action because of that denial, alleging nine causes of action against State Farm. After carefully considering the parties’ written submissions, the Court concludes oral argument is not necessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the November 16, 2023 hearing, and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part State Farm’s motion to dismiss without prejudice and with leave to amend. Doe’s complaint fails to sufficiently plead most of his claims, and Doe’s response to State Farm’s motion to dismiss concedes or ignores most of State Farm’s arguments. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS …