McCalla
McCalla v. Nord
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD A MCCALLA, Case No. 4:22-cv-00675-KAW
Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE; ORDER REGARDING
v. MOTIONS IN LIMINE
JAMES NORD, Dkt. Nos. 62, 68, 80-83 Defendant.
12 I. MOTIONS IN LIMINE Plaintiff has filed one motion in limine, and Defendant has filed four. (Pl.’s Mots. in Limine, “Pl.’s MIL,” Dkt. No. 62; Def.’s Mots. in Limine, “Def.’s MIL,” Dkt. No. 68.) A. Plaintiff’s MIL No. 1: To exclude or limit the testimony of Defendant’s liability expert Raymond Tate 17 Plaintiff seeks to exclude Defendant’s expert Raymond Tate under Federal Rule of 18 Evidence 702 on the grounds that he lacks the requisite experience and qualifications to offer 19 opinions regarding the duties and responsibilities of a professional trustee. (Pl.’s MIL at 1.) 20 Plaintiff provided Tate’s report, as well as excerpts of his deposition testimony, which indicate 21 that Tate worked in financial services as a financial…