McCalla

McCalla v. Nord

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20234:22-cv-00675California3,918 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD A MCCALLA, Case No. 4:22-cv-00675-KAW

Plaintiff, ORDER FOLLOWING PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE; ORDER REGARDING

v. MOTIONS IN LIMINE

JAMES NORD, Dkt. Nos. 62, 68, 80-83 Defendant.

12 I. MOTIONS IN LIMINE Plaintiff has filed one motion in limine, and Defendant has filed four. (Pl.’s Mots. in Limine, “Pl.’s MIL,” Dkt. No. 62; Def.’s Mots. in Limine, “Def.’s MIL,” Dkt. No. 68.) A. Plaintiff’s MIL No. 1: To exclude or limit the testimony of Defendant’s liability expert Raymond Tate 17 Plaintiff seeks to exclude Defendant’s expert Raymond Tate under Federal Rule of 18 Evidence 702 on the grounds that he lacks the requisite experience and qualifications to offer 19 opinions regarding the duties and responsibilities of a professional trustee. (Pl.’s MIL at 1.) 20 Plaintiff provided Tate’s report, as well as excerpts of his deposition testimony, which indicate 21 that Tate worked in financial services as a financial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.