Thomas
Thomas v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ADRIENNE THOMAS, Case No. 23-cv-00065-JSW
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. VACATE AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENTRY PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC OF JUDGMENT AND ENTERING
COMPANY, JUDGMENT
11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 30-31 12 This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of what the Court has construed as Plaintiff’s motion to vacate pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. Also before the Court is Defendant’s motion for entry of Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(d). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it concludes oral argument is not necessary. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). On January 5, 2023, Plaintiff filed the original complaint. On April 7, 2023, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Under the Northern District Civil Local Rules, Plaintiff’s opposition would have been due…