Turner

Turner v. Stripe Payments Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20234:23-cv-03385California463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TERRANCE TURNER, Case No. 23-cv-03385-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION

STRIPE PAYMENTS COMPANY, et al., Re: ECF No. 8 Defendants.

12 The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Alex Tse’s report and recommendation to dismiss this action for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). ECF No. 8. In his original complaint against Defendants, Plaintiff Terrance Turner alleged that Defendants are “misusing data in violation of Computer Fraud and Abuse Case Act, Wire Fraud Statutes, and other financial, consumer protection, privacy laws and legal statutes.” ECF No. 7 at 4. Judge Tse found that these allegations were legal conclusions “not entitled to the assumption of truth.” ECF No. 6 at 1 (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 680 (2009)). In assessing Turner’s amended complaint—which “add[ed] over a dozen criminal claims under Title 18 of the United States Code,” as well as a “host of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.