Twitch Interactive, Inc. v. Fishwoodco GmbH

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20235:22-cv-03218California3,142 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TWITCH INTERACTIVE, INC., Case No. 5:22-cv-03218-EJD

Petitioner, ORDER ON MOTIONS TO

INTERVENE AND FOR DEFAULT

v. JUDGMENT

FISHWOODCO GMBH, Re: ECF Nos. 36, 39 Respondent.

Petitioner Twitch Interactive, Inc. (“Twitch” or “Petitioner”) brings this action to confirm the final arbitration awards issued in the matter of Twitch Interactive, Inc. v. Fishwoodco GmbH d/b/a Loots, JAMS Ref. No. 1110024636. ECF No. 1. Although Respondent Fishwoodco GmbH has not made an appearance, three third parties—Loots Media GmbH, Fuehnen Holding GmbH, and Marc Fuehnen (collectively, “Proposed Intervenors”)—have moved to intervene in this action because the arbitral award would purport to bind them as well. ECF No. 39 (“Mot.”). Based on the foregoing, the Court GRANTS Proposed Intervenors’ motion to intervene, DENIES the Proposed Intervenors’ request for leave to file as amici curiae, and DENIES …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.