Valentine

Valentine v. Crocs, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20233:22-cv-07463California3,306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 MARTHA VALENTINE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07463-TLT (PHK) Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER ON DISCOVERY LETTER

BRIEF NO.

CROCS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 45 Defendant.

13 INTRODUCTION Now before the Court is a joint discovery letter brief regarding three disputes: (1) whether the Court should set a deadline for substantial completion of Defendant’s electronically stored information (“ESI”) document production and, if so, what deadline should be set; (2) the scope of discovery relating to the products at issue; and (3) Defendant’s responses to Plaintiffs’ discovery requests for marketing materials. [Dkt. 45]. The case has been referred to the undersigned for resolution of discovery disputes and all further discovery matters. See Dkt. 46. This is a putative class action brought by Plaintiffs Martha Valentine, Ruby Cornejo, and Tiffany Avino (“Plaintiffs”) against Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.