Roshan

Roshan v. Lawrence

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20234:21-cv-01235California1,674 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PEYMAN ROSHAN, Case No. 21-cv-01235-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

MELANIE J. LAWRENCE, et al., Re: ECF No. 153 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment. ECF No. 153. The Court will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND Because the facts are well-known to the parties and the Court has summarized Plaintiff’s allegations in detail in its prior order, ECF No. 139, the Court will not elaborate them at length here. In sum, Plaintiff Peyman Roshan brings this action against Defendants the Office of Chief Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California (“OCTC”); George Cardona, the current Chief Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California; and his predecessor, Melanie J. Lawrence. He challenges both the State Bar Rules of Procedure and the internal rules and policies of the State Bar as unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.