Chagolla

Chagolla v. Schrag

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20233:23-cv-00812California2,285 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAYMUNDO J. CHAGOLLA, Case No. 23-cv-00812-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. Re: Dkt. No. 10 J. SCHRAG, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at California State Prison - Solano, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officials at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), where he was previously housed. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Dkt. No. 10) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.