Faizi

Faizi v. Temori

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20235:22-cv-04224California1,224 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 AHMAD MUKHTAR FAIZI, an individual Case No. 22-cv-04224-VKD and derivatively on behalf of FALAFEL FLAME, INC.,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, THIRD MOTION RE CONTEMPT v. Re: Dkt. No.

BAKTASH TEMORI, et al., Defendants. 13 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Ahmad Mukhtar Faizi filed a “Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint for Money Damages and Injunctive Relief,” seeking relief for himself and on behalf of nominal defendant Falafel Flame, Inc. (“Falafel Flame”), against two of Falafel Flame’s directors, Baktash Temori and Masoud Rustakhis, as well as a number of entities, including allegedly unauthorized Falafel Flame restaurants. On August 18, 2023, the Court held a hearing on the parties’ July 29, 20231 joint discovery letter brief concerning Mr. Faizi’s document requests. See Dkt. Nos. 73, 76. While defendants acknowledged that Mr. Faizi had not received discovery that was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.