Russell

Russell v. Maman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20233:18-cv-06691California2,993 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN RUSSELL,

Case No. 18-cv-06691-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT; GRANTING NIR MAMAN, et al., MOTION TO ESTABLISH COSTS 13 Defendants.

I. INTRODUCTION This long running circus must finally be brought to an end. At present, Defendant Maman has filed a motion to set aside the final judgment and Third Party Defendants/Cross-claimants Ronen Shlomo and Bsecure have filed a motion to establish costs. Emblematic of Plaintiff Russell’s persistent failure to adhere to deadlines in this case, he filed an opposition to Maman’s motion twelve days after the court-imposed deadline, citing technical issues. In a footnote, he also forewarned that he will be bringing a subsequent motion to set aside judgment (almost seven months after he was first ordered to show cause why his claims should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute). While…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.