Robertson

Robertson v. Lopez

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20233:23-cv-04030California1,185 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 ERINE ROBERTSON, Case No. 23-cv-04030-SVK

Plaintiff,

FURTHER SCREENING ORDER

v. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E)

LOPEZ, et al., Defendants.

On August 9, 2023, Plaintiff Erine Robertson, appearing pro se, filed a civil complaint concerning an alleged incident beginning on August 12, 2021 during which Plaintiff claims she was improperly arrested and detained at a hospital and two jail facilities. Dkt. 1 (“Original Complaint”). Along with the Original Complaint, Plaintiff filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 2. On September 11, 2023, the Court issued an order in which it granted Plaintiff’s IFP application and found, pursuant to the Court’s initial screening review for civil action filed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, that the Original Complaint did not state a claim upon which the Court may grant relief. Dkt. 6 (“First Screening Order”). Specifically, the Court’s First Screening Order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.