Gutierrez

Gutierrez v. C&H Sugar, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20233:23-cv-03192California5,354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FREDDY GUTIERREZ, Case No. 23-cv-03192-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE

C&H SUGAR, INC., CLASS ALLEGATIONS Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint and motion to strike class allegations. Dkt. No. 31. Plaintiff opposes. Dkt. No. 34. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the motions are suitable for resolution without oral argument, and VACATES the November 17, 2023 hearing. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the motions. 18 BACKGROUND1 I. General Allegations Plaintiff Freddy Gutierrez (“Gutierrez”) brings this class action against defendant C&H Sugar, Inc. (“C&H”) “for its release of noxious odors onto Plaintiff’s property.” Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) ¶ 1, 2, 4. Defendant owns and operates…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.