Herrera

Herrera v. Ortega

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20235:20-cv-02035California5,437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSHUA S. HERRERA, Case No. 20-cv-02035 BLF Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; REFERRING TO

SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS;

J. ORTEGA, et al., STAYING CASE; INSTRUCTIONS

TO CLERK Defendants.

16 (Docket No. 37) 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison staff at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) and an appeals examiner at the Office of Appeals. The Court found the second amended complaint (“SAC”), Dkt. No. 15, stated a cognizable claim for retaliation, and ordered Defendants Lt. J. Ortega, Officer R. Castillo-Ruiz,1 Officer B. Duran, and Officer R. Cardona to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. Dkt. No. 16.2

1 Plaintiff originally identified this Defendant as “Castillo,” but Defendants’ filings indicate that the proper name is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.