Morilha
Morilha v. Superior Court of California County of Santa Clara
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL VITOR MORILHA, Case No. 22-cv-03565-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Re: ECF No.
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,
11 Defendant.
12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Daniel V. Morilha’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 67. For the reasons stated below, the Court will deny the motion.1 On June 16, 2022, Plaintiff filed his complaint in this action against Defendant Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara (“Superior Court”). ECF No. 1. He filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) on August 29, 2022. ECF No. 17. Defendant thereafter moved to dismiss. ECF No. 22. In granting Defendant’s motion, the Court held that Plaintiff’s claims were barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, and that Plaintiff failed to allege that he complied with the State of California’s claim presentation requirement. ECF No. 50. Because amendment would have been…