McGee

McGee v. Milpitas Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20235:23-cv-02559California1,654 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ANTHONY MCGEE, Case No. 23-cv-02559-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND

JUDGMENT

MILPITAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 45 Defendants.

13 On October 23, 2023, the Court issued an order dismissing Mr. McGee’s amended complaint with prejudice and entered judgment against him. Dkt. Nos. 43, 44. Now, Mr. McGee, who is representing himself, has filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. No. 45. Defendants Milpitas Police Department and the City of Milpitas oppose this motion. Dkt. No. 46. The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Upon consideration of the moving papers and the applicable law, the Court denies Mr. McGee’s motion to alter or amend the judgment. I. LEGAL STANDARD The Court may alter or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.