Kamerer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANNA M SCHASKER, Case No. 23-cv-02893-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCREENING

v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants.

Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Anna Schasker’s First Amended Complaint (the “FAC” at Dkt. 18). The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and then screened her original complaint under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e), concluded “that [it did] not state a claim upon which relief can be granted” and directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. See Dkt. 12 at 5. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (see Dkt. 10), and the Court now screens Plaintiff’s FAC. For the reasons discussed below, the Court concludes that the FAC fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and ORDERS Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint by December 18, 2023. I. BACKGROUND …