Kelly

Kelly v. Cubesmart

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20234:22-cv-05470California1,929 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CYNTHIA RENEE KELLY, Case No. 22-cv-05470-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v.

CUBESMART, et al., Defendants.

For the reasons explained below, the Court DISMISSES Pro Se Plaintiff Cynthia Kelly’s case for failure to prosecute. I. BACKGROUND This case was removed to this district on September 26, 2022. Dkt. No. 1. Defendants moved to dismiss and strike on November 9 and November 16, 2022. Dkt. Nos. 27, 33. On June 21, 2023, the Court granted the Lewis Brisbois’ Defendants’ motion to strike, granted in part and denied in part the Cubesmart Defendants’ motion to dismiss, and denied the Cubesmart Defendants’ motion to strike. Dkt. No. 87. The Court gave Plaintiff 28 days to file any amended complaint as to any claims for which leave to amend was granted. Id. The Court notified Plaintiff of the Court’s Legal Help Center for pro se litigants, and has done so again since. Id.; see also Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.