Torres

Torres v. Hansen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20233:16-cv-06607California750 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIO TORRES, Case No. 16-cv-06607-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER REFERRING PARTIES TO A

DECEMBER 6, 2023 SETTLEMENT

v. CONFERENCE WITH MAGISTRATE

JUDGE SPERO AND SETTING

MIKE HANSEN and DANIEL SMITH, FURTHER STATUS CONFERENCE

FOR DECEMBER 15, 2023

Defendants.

12 On November 15, 2023, after a three day trial and two days of deliberations, the jury reached 13 a verdict as to some of plaintiff’s claims but deadlocked on one claim as to one defendant. The jury 14 reached the following verdict: (1) on Claim 1, Warrantless Entry of Apartment, the jury found in 15 favor of defendants Hansen and Smith; (2) on Claim 2, Excessive Force Prior to Handcuffing, the 16 jury found in favor of defendant Smith and could not reach a verdict as to defendant Hansen; and 17 (3) on Claim 3, Excessive Force After Handcuffing, the jury found in favor of defendant Hansen. 18 In response to questioning from the Court, the jury stated that they could not reach agreement on 19 the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.