Vitale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FRANCESCO VITALE, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01902-JD

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

v.

BRYAN D. JORDAN, et al., Defendants.

12 The Court ordered pro se plaintiffs Francesco and Frances Vitale to file a status statement by October 20, 2023, “addressing their failure to timely serve defendants, and their failure to file, or cooperate in the filing of, a case management statement.” Dkt. No. 23 at 2. Plaintiffs filed a case management statement by the deadline, see Dkt. No. 30, but still have not explained their failure to serve. Plaintiffs have also filed a slew of motions, which are denied for the following reasons. Plaintiffs’ request for a temporary restraining order, Dkt. No. 26, is denied under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. Plaintiffs did not offer “specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint clearly show[ing] that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse party can be heard in opposition,” or “certif[y] in…