Nanometrics, Incorporated v. Optical Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20235:18-cv-00417California980 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OPTICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Case No. 18-cv-00417-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING RESERVED

v. PORTION OF NANOMETRICS, INC.’S

MOTION IN LIMINE NO.

NANOMETRICS, INCORPORATED, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 163, 191 11 Defendants.

NANOMETRICS, INCORPORATED, et al., 13 Cross-Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 OPTICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., 16 Cross-Defendants. 17 On October 20, 2023, the Court held a pretrial conference in this action, during which it issued oral rulings on Nanometrics, Inc.’s motions in limine. The Court subsequently issued an order the (“MILs Order”) expanding on those oral rulings. See Order Re Nanometrics’s MILs, ECF No. 191. As explained in the MILs Order, the Court reserved its decision as to the portion of Nanometrics’s Motion in Limine No. 2 (“MIL No. 2”), ECF No. 163, seeking to exclude Richard Trissel from testifying as an expert witness for Optical Solutions, Inc. (“Optical”) regarding his opinion on whether a lens…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.