Boyd

Boyd v. City of San Rafael

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20233:23-cv-04085California354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHALEETA BOYD, et al., Case No. 23-cv-04085-EMC (EMC)

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' v. MOTION FOR EXPEDITED

TRANSCRIPTS AT THE

GOVERNMENT'S EXPENSE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, et al., 11 Defendants. Docket No. 92 12 Plaintiffs that are proceeding in forma pauperis filed a motion for expedited transcripts at the government’s expense. Docket No. 92. Plaintiffs ask not only to have copies emailed to them, but also that 14 hard copies of each transcript be mailed to the Plaintiffs. Id. Plaintiffs cite to 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) for the proposition that the transcripts should be provided to them at the government’s expense. Id. However, this statute is not applicable. This statute provides that “Fees for transcripts furnished in other proceedings to persons permitted to appeal in forma pauperis shall also be paid by the United States if the trial judge or a circuit judge certifies that the appeal is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.