Marani

Marani v. Cramer

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20234:19-cv-05538California517 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN MARANI, Case No.: 4:19-cv-5538-YGR

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS

MARK CRAMER, FLORENCE CRAMER, AND

v. SCOTT CRAMER SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION

MICHAEL CRAMER, ET AL.,

Defendants.

13 In this case, the Court previously granted defendants Mark Cramer, Florence Cramer, and 14 Scott Cramer’s two motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Dkt. Nos. 60 and 73.) In 15 the most recent Order, the Court noted that Mark Cramer and Florence Cramer are citizens of 16 Canada and living in Calgary, Alberta. (Dkt. No. 73.) Scott Cramer is a citizen of Canada and 17 living in Vancouver, British Columbia. (Id.) The Court noted that the allegations did not establish 18 that those three defendants’ actions were directed at California. (Id.) Plaintiff then filed a second 19 amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 76.)1 This time, instead of moving to dismiss, the three Cramer 20 defendants filed an answer. (Dkt. No. 77.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.