Fuller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JESSICA FULLER, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01440-AGT

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO REMAND OR IN THE

ALTERNATIVE FOR LEAVE TO

BLOOM INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, CONDUCT JURISDICTIONAL et al., DISCOVERY 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 25 12 Shortly after plaintiffs filed this putative class action in California state court, defendants removed it to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). Currently pending is plaintiffs’ motion to remand or, in the alternative, for leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery. Dkt. 25. The sole disputed issue is whether defendants have satisfied the $5 million amount-in-controversy requirement for removal under CAFA. The Court finds that they have, and explains why below. Plaintiffs’ motion to remand is therefore denied. I. BACKGROUND A. Complaint Allegations and Procedural History Plaintiffs…