McGee

McGee v. Milpitas Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20235:23-cv-02559California326 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ANTHONY MCGEE, Case No. 23-cv-02559-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

JUDGMENT

MILPITAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 49 Defendants.

13 On November 16, 2023, plaintiff Anthony McGee, who is representing himself, filed a “Motion for Relief [from] Final Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(a).” Dkt. No. 49. The same day, Mr. McGee filed a notice of appeal of “all orders and final judgments in the case” to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Dkt. No. 50. Mr. McGee’s motion requests reconsideration on the merits of the Court’s previous decisions denying his motions for default and dismissing his case, rather than the correction of a clerical mistake. See Dkt. No. 49. This is not a proper subject for a motion under Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Garamendi v. Henin, 683 F.3d 1069, 1077 (9th Cir. 2012) (“We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.