King
King v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20233:22-cv-07484California4,197 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
AARON KING, Plaintiff, No. C 22-07484 WHA
v.
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
LLC, LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS, FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
INC., TRANS UNION, LLC, and
EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants.
17 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brought this action alleging that he was subject to inaccurate credit reporting. A prior order granted the motions to dismiss all claims against three of our four defendants (defendant Trans Union did not move to dismiss), but allowed plaintiff to seek leave to amend his complaint. Plaintiff now moves to do so. For the reasons below stated, plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. STATEMENT Defendants are four consumer reporting agencies (“CRAs”): Equifax Information Services, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Trans Union, and Experian Information Solutions. The specific facts…