King

King v. Equifax Information Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20233:22-cv-07484California4,197 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AARON KING, Plaintiff, No. C 22-07484 WHA

v.

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

LLC, LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS, FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

INC., TRANS UNION, LLC, and

EXPERIAN INFORMATION

SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants.

17 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brought this action alleging that he was subject to inaccurate credit reporting. A prior order granted the motions to dismiss all claims against three of our four defendants (defendant Trans Union did not move to dismiss), but allowed plaintiff to seek leave to amend his complaint. Plaintiff now moves to do so. For the reasons below stated, plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. STATEMENT Defendants are four consumer reporting agencies (“CRAs”): Equifax Information Services, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Trans Union, and Experian Information Solutions. The specific facts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.