Roth

Roth v. Trex Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20233:23-cv-04895California1,915 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GARY B. ROTH, Case No. 23-cv-04895-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. ENFORCE JUDGMENT

TREX COMPANY, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 12 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Trex Company, Inc.’s (“Trex”) motion to enforce judgment. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for February 29, 2024, is VACATED. See Civil L.R. 7-6. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion for the following reasons. I. Background A. Factual Background On April 7, 2010, in Ross v. Trex Company, Inc., Case No. 5:09-CV00670-JF (“Class Action Settlement”), this Court approved a nationwide class action settlement involving allegations of a surface flaking defect in Trex’s manufactured decking products. ECF 12 (“Motion”) at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.