Bell v. Lee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VINCENT KEITH BELL, Case No. 13-cv-05820-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS THIRD AMENDED

CHRISTOPHER KROL, et al., COMPLAINT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 217

12 Defendant City and County of San Francisco (the “City”) has again moved to dismiss plaintiff Vincent Bell’s second cause of action (42 U.S.C. § 1983 – Monell Liability and Supervisory Liability against the City and County of San Francisco), this time from the third amended complaint (“TAC”). The City also moves to strike certain allegations from the TAC. In the alternative, the City seeks a more definite statement. The parties have also raised a discovery dispute regarding whether the City should designate a Rule 30(b)(6) deponent on two topics related to the Monell claim. Dkt. No. 220. These matters came on for hearing on November 17, 2023. 21 BACKGROUND …