Tashjian

Tashjian v. Invictus Residential Pooler - 2A

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 27, 20235:19-cv-01536California1,392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 VAHE TASHJIAN, Case No. 5:19-cv-01536-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

DISBURSE SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS

v.

INVICTUS RESIDENTIAL POOLER - 2A, Re: ECF No. 220 et al., 12 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff has purportedly reached settlement with certain Defendants in this case and now seeks an order pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 708.440(b), disbursing the settlement proceeds to Plaintiff’s counsel over the two judgment creditors who have appeared in this case. For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND On August 27, 2021, approximately two and a half years after Plaintiff filed this action, Bell Investment Partners, LLC filed a Notice of Judgment Lien for $2,286,372.40. ECF No. 98. On November 8, 2022, Charles Mousseau (collectively with Bell Investment Partners, “Judgment Creditors”) also filed a Notice of Judgment Lien for $1,693,519.62. ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.