Laatz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION;

DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., RESPONSE REGARDING REQUEST

FOR CLARIFICATION

Defendants. 11 Re: ECF No. 159

13 Presently before the Court is Defendants Zazzle, Inc. (“Zazzle”) and Mohamed Alkhatib’s 14 (together, “Defendants”) Motion for Leave to Seek Clarification and Reconsideration (the 15 “Motion”) of the Court’s Order on Plaintiff Nicky Laatz’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Partial 16 Summary Judgment (the “MSJ Order”). See Mot., ECF No. 159. Defendants seek leave to 17 request (1) clarification that they dispute the existence of mutual assent to the License Terms 18 document that Plaintiff alleges is part of a four-document contract between the parties, and (2) 19 reconsideration of the portion of the MSJ Order finding Defendants demonstrated mutual assent to 20 the License Terms. See id. at 2–4.

I. …