Estavillo

Estavillo v. Cortese

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20235:23-cv-04032California2,754 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ERIK ESTAVILLO, Case No. 23-cv-04032-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

DAVE CORTESE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 13 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Erik Estavillo filed this action against defendants Dave Cortese and the Country Club Villa Apartments (“Apartments”), alleging the violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Dkt. No. 1. Defendants now move pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint. Dkt. No. 13. Mr. Estavillo opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 14. The matter is deemed suitable for determination without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The November 28, 2023 motion hearing is vacated. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers,1 the Court denies defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.2 I. BACKGROUND According to the complaint, Mr. Estavillo lived at the Apartments with his parents. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.